<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robot Monkeys &#187; baybridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robotmonkeys.net/tag/baybridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robotmonkeys.net</link>
	<description>The monkeys know all.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 07:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bay Bridge Arcology</title>
		<link>http://robotmonkeys.net/2010/01/16/bay-bridge-arcology/</link>
		<comments>http://robotmonkeys.net/2010/01/16/bay-bridge-arcology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture / furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baybridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronaldrael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanfrancisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginiasanfratello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robotmonkeys.net/?p=2211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Bay Bridge, seemingly always in the news*, the question is becoming, what to do with the old eastern span? (You remember the eastern span, don&#8217;t you?) Current plans are to simply demolish it, but architects Ronald Rael and Virginia San Fratello has proposed something different. They wants to convert it into a housing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://robotmonkeys.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/20091109_04.jpg"/><br />
<img src="http://robotmonkeys.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/20091112_06.png"/></p>
<p>With <a href="http://baybridgeinfo.org/">the Bay Bridge</a>, seemingly <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ3rTq59x5U">always</a> <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-08-23/news/17178610_1_bay-bridge-signature-bridge-golden-gate-bridge">in</a> <a href="http://baybridgeinfo.org/1/index.html">the</a> <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-10-28/news/17185294_1_eastern-span-bay-bridge-bridge-closure">news</a><sup>*</sup>, the question is becoming, what to do with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_span_replacement_of_the_San_Francisco_–_Oakland_Bay_Bridge">the old eastern span</a>?  (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Loma_Prieta_earthquake#San_Francisco_.E2.80.93_Oakland_Bay_Bridge">You remember</a> the eastern span, don&#8217;t you?)  Current plans are to simply demolish it, but architects <a href="http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/ced/people/arch_query.php?id=416&#038;dept=ARCH&#038;title=Faculty&#038;first=Ronald&#038;last=Rael&#038;ced&#038;berkeley">Ronald Rael</a> and <a href="http://www.rael-sanfratello.com/">Virginia San Fratello</a> has proposed something different.  They wants to convert it into a housing and a park. </p>
<p>He calls his proposal,  &#8220;<a href="http://www.nickburnsonline.com/baybridge/bayline/">The Bay Line</a>,&#8221; is a combination of the Florence&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponte_Vecchio">Ponte Vecchio</a> and New York&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thehighline.org/">High Line</a>.  The upper deck would be converted into a greenway, while the lower deck (originally designed for freight trains) would contain commercial and residential spaces.  Since the deck can support much weight than a typical home, additional space can be hung directly underneath the bridge.</p>
<p>Rael&#8217;s graduate studio, have come up with <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/12/MNE61BE3R7.DTL">other similar ideas</a>, but they&#8217;re all essentially the same thing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea, but I do have some concerns.  First, there&#8217;s going to be another earthquake.  There just will be.  So why would you want to be suspended a couple of hundred feet above the water, in a box that has been bolted onto a structure that is over 70 years, that is literally falling apart.  (Well at least it&#8217;s not as bad as <a href="http://bridgehunter.com/mo/cape/old/">the old</a> <a href="http://semissourian.com/topic/bridge/">Cape Girardeau bridge</a>.  Yet.)  Rael points out most of the damage back in 1989 was on the approach, not the cantilevers, but I still have my doubts.  My other concern is that it&#8217;s right next to new bridge.  Which means, you&#8217;re living <a href="http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2010/01/11/mn-ntlew_south_r_0501028559.jpg">right next to a freeway</a>, and that&#8217;s got to ruin your view.</p>
<p>But really, I&#8217;d just be happy if they name the eastern span the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton">Emperor Norton I</a> Span&#8221;, but <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/12/16/MNG80ACOTV1.DTL">Oaklanders are such killjoys</a>.</p>
<hr/>
<sup>*</sup><a href="http://www.sci-experiments.com/BrokenBridge/BrokenBridge.html">Nifty closeups of the recent repairs.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robotmonkeys.net/2010/01/16/bay-bridge-arcology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

